Article Search:
Free Articles on History and many other topics
Another free History article for you

Home | Politics | History


People Shouldn't Complain so Much When It's Not Due - By: Luat Tran Van, Posted on: 2007-12-04

U.S. imperialism and the ecological impact of its actions are being constantly criticised regarding its intervention in Central America to build the Panama canal, but who would have done things better?

The very existence of the Panama canal not only facilitates commerce but communications at large, has diminished notably the number of ship accidents around the Drake strait and Tierra del Fuego, the collateral contamination in the area as a result of ships being sunk by fate and the weather, increases the speed with which humanitarian help reaches different parts of the globe and of course, has contributed significantly to the development of Panama, like it or not.

Since the Central American isthmus was closed naturally by geological forces some million years ago, the Atlantic and the Pacific have been left out of touch except thorough the Arctic see or Cape Horn; however, proposing any seaman to do a trip thorough any of those places has never been quite well received.

The United States has committed quite a lot of abuses in central America and indeed, the construction of the Panama canal was no exception; however, the same task could not be achieved today so easily due to political and ecological constraints and at the time there was no other way to achieve such a goal so the critiques that the U.S.A. receives regarding this issue are largely baseless and unfair.

First of all, the benefits that we are all reaping because of the existence of the canal reach the whole world, and not only from a commercial or strategic perspective. Secondly, the construction of the canal, while it was done indeed by using a lot of pressure and arbitrary measures regarding Panama's sovereign rights over its territory now means jobs, income, technology and a role to play in the world for the small central American nation; none of this would exist if it were not for the canal and the imperialism that led to its construction. Third, one of the key aspects of the construction was to get rid of mosquitoes as well as infectious foci in the area, and that meant a significant improvement in public health at the national level in Panama.

And then, lastly, we should ask ourselves: Who would have done the job better? If any could do so in the past or even right now, why is it that we don't have another, better canal somewhere else? So, while it is important to remember what the U.S.A. did wrong in the continent, it is also fair to remember what it did right; we should not forget the good things either, and the Panama canal is one of them.

Article Source: http://articleowner.com

You will find more useful and curious articles at Andinia.com. You can also get in touch with Don Pablo Edronkin directly to learn more and exchange views about these topics.

Please Rate this Article

 

Not yet Rated

Click the XML Icon Above to Receive History Articles Via RSS!
Copyright ©2006Articleowner.com a free article directory to submit articles for fresh web content for websites & article writing submission for internet article ezine email marketing,for top ranking for search engines link building backlinks by rss feeds by self publishing, adsense, make money at home online money making home based business work at home opportunities for online information quality articles directory & stress management, free articles on insurance review, wealth, pixel advertising, web content, traffic, software, money making ideas & articles
Terms of Service | Submission Guidelines | Contact Us | Link to Us| Privacy Policy | About Us
Get PAID to Watch Never Before Seen Movie Trailers
Get a Free psychic reading

Powered by Article Dashboard